SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 47.76+1.3%10:17 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Barry A. Watzman who wrote (21912)5/14/1997 2:54:00 PM
From: ----------   of 186894
 
Thank you for the well written response.

As you note, not much in the area of facts yet. For the record, I
do not currently have a stock position in INTEL.

I did find the fact that DEC had threatened to sue Microsoft over NT, (post #21826.. source Dow Jones,Inc.) rather interesting. It would
lend credence to the also posted theory that DEC either has, or think they have, a very broad patent covering any architecture based on
native 32 bit applications. This would be analogous, IMO, to saying
"we patented the way to exit a room with 4 walls a ceiling, a floor
and one door. It is called:"Open the door"." Such a patent while
at one point in the evolutionary process of man might have been considered a brilliant innovation, would now be ruled as FAR too
broad and archaic to be worth the papyrus it was written on. It is
in the public domain.

I know some people who did consulting work for Intel in the very early
1990's. Intel was vigorously working on the Pentuim, Pro & II back
then. To say they did NO R & D is ludricrous. They hired friends of
mine to come in and consult. They sat in meetings with R & D teams.
Unless Intel was paying these people to sit in a room and play Gin
rummy "just to make things look good".

Regards,

Doug
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext