Geeez, when I was in school we were taught sex-ed by being shown pictures of Tizio in the National Geographic.
I doubt it...
Rather, I suspect you are more along the lines of Jerry Fallwell, read on...
______________
The big problem with pornography is defining it. You can't just say it's pictures of people naked. For example, you have these primitive African tribes that exist by chasing the wildebeest on foot, and they have to go around largely naked, because, as the old tribal saying goes: "N'wam k'honi soit qui mali," which means, "If you think you can catch a wildebeest in this climate and wear clothes at the same time, then I have some beach front property in the desert region of Northern Mali that you may be interested in."
So it's not considered pornographic when National Geographic publishes color photographs of these people hunting the wildebeest naked, or pounding one rock onto another rock for some primitive reason naked, or whatever. But if National Geographic were to publish an article entitled "The Girls of the California Junior College System Hunt the Wildebeest Naked," some people would call it pornography. But others would not. And still others, such as the Spectacularly Rev. Jerry Falwell, would get upset about seeing the wildebeest naked.
- Dave Barry, "Pornography"
Dave Barry is a columnist for the Chicago Tribune
_______
P. s. You are still a fraud. [I am not religious but...] |
