What accusations and false conclusions did I make? I was actually commending you for your investigative skills.
To: scheherezadesdance who wrote (56261)
From: Wolff
Tuesday, May 16, 2000 3:09 PM ET
Respond to Post # 56339 of 56340
I am still in shock from the events of yesterday I will say just a little bit now. I watched a bunch of blalokanits argue in front of a Federal Judge that donations made to refugees should be considered worthless.
The government spared no expense to address Anthony's acts of charity. They had to; they were not representing
any wounded parties. The Insurance Corporation addressed the situation and was done with it. No restitutions
were asked for. So, the prosecutors spared no expense to fight against the good works that Anthony has done.
This topic of Anthony's Charity efforts was so important to the governments case they flew in two witnesses to
address the topic. Don't speculate if these acts of charity were part of the case. The government felt it was
important to fight in the most aggressive way possible.
The Prosecutors put a FBI special agent on the task to interviewing the Charity in Kosovo. Took him 3 separate
interviews, and countless hours of time, to get the information that the President of the Charity to say he created false document receipts. He told the Judge that man he interviewed said his signature DID not guarantee that the actions he represented with his signature for the Charity's were true in fact. This FBI guy with all his resources,was not able to offer out why this changed story occurred. First, the charity said it made no receipts. Earlier the wife of the man that signed the document and now says is false said that there was much corruption within charities distributing funds.
Did the government dispute that Anthony was helping many families of refugees now in San Diego that were
subjected to the most clear acts Genocide in Western Europe since 1939. (1984's Wordspeak came true ya
know. we call Genocide "Ethnic Cleansing", Orwell's lessons ignored.) NO the government did not dispute that
Anthony testified to congress and did in fact facilitate Visas, and did not dispute the testimony by the refugees were
currently being supported.
Boiled down the only thing that was said was that a Charity organization with a president that admitted to creating a
false document, was upset that significant money went directly to refugees.
I am in Shock still, I can not believe what I watched.
To take undisputed and significant acts of charity, use this, and spin it for exterior reasons, is beyond me. I feel it is
an actions of someone without a soul. I can only hope for them, and pray for the others they encounter.
Why would these people and prosecutors decide to BLAST Anthony on something like this beyond me? They
could have allowed the truth of the charity to exist and maintained their quest for same judgment before
the court. I expect honesty, and yes even intellectual honesty, in a government offical. Even if they are a
prosecutor, even if that is counter to his Ego to win, the prosecution needs to reside in truth. Not shaved and
scaled, slighted, omitted submissions to the court.
I feel this prosecutor was committed to winning, he was not committed to the truth. I feel the Texas court process I
saw was was not bound by the concept of justice. In my opinion that court, was compromised by itself and its
officers who declined on their duty to the truth, and at the end of the day, the Judge allowed it.
What do you think scheherezadesdance?
And my response before I saw that you edited it:
All I will say is that I think there is more to everything than meets the eye. I also believe that sometimes if you can't catch a person on one thing they will try to get them on something else. You see that all the time with mobsters.
Clearly, they wanted Anthony to go down. However, I was always puzzled as to why they let him plea bargain down to one count - unless it was to forgo any lengthy appeals process or they wanted him to have the label "convicted felon" as quickly as possible. I just found the plea bargain odd considering that it was apparent they wanted Anthony.
To show you that some people out there know more than others..here is a post from Feminvestor who already seemed to know the Charity was going to be an issue.
ragingbull.com
With that said, it is possible the outcome could have been different in a different state in a different court.
That should tell you something about the justice system ;-) |
