KVH Industries, Inc. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : KVH Industries, Inc.

KVHI 5.870

+1.4%

2:30 PM EDT

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sector Investor who wrote (504)	7/13/2000 7:32:50 AM
From: MikeM54321	Read Replies (1) of 7249

Sector- Seeing that the beam is two-way, I would say yes. If a FOG solution was used, it would seem to have to be on both buildings. There is an alternative that the laser players offer to the sway problem. It's one of making the beam larger and diffused. But seems like this defeats the purpose of a laser beam? So I don't quite understand it. Maybe it's a matter of economics. Either pay to keep it stabilized, or pay for it in terms of bandwidth by diffusing the beam. OR maybe, FOG is so new, it just has not been presented as an idea to the fiberless optic players yet? That's the one KVHI investors hope for. -MikeM(From Florida)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next