SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (442)7/13/2000 9:14:53 AM
From: StockDung   of 12465
 
Just a reminder that George C. Chachas is also Ziasun's attorney according to the SEC filings. tenkwizard.com

Re: OT - 4/25/00 - Dismissal of Securities Fraud Claims Against Internet Newsletter Is Denied
April 25, 2000

Dismissal of Securities Fraud Claims Against Internet Newsletter Is Denied

On April 25, 2000, the Honorable Leonard B. Sand, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, issued a memorandum and order in Alan Fellman, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs v. Electro Optical Systems Corp., Charles Weaver, George C. Chachas, U.S. Milestone, Thomas Edward Cavanagh, William Levy, Donald & Co., Cosimo Tacopino, the Future Superstock, and Barrow Street Research, Defendants, No. 98 Civ. 6403 LBS, 2000 WL 489713 (S.D.N.Y., Memorandum and Order filed Apr. 25, 2000). In that case, the plaintiff alleges that he and a reputed class of similarly-situated people were defrauded in a scheme that included fraudulent statements published in an Internet newsletter known as "The Future Superstock". Plaintiff alleges that The Future Superstock recommended the purchase of stock in Electro Optical Systems Corporation and made seven allegedly false misstatements. In its opinion, the Court analyzes each of the alleged misstatements and assesses the issues of whether plaintiff adequately alleged falsity, scienter, materiality, reliance and loss causation. In perhaps the most interesting twist, lawyers for The Future Superstock argued that it was "unreasonable for Plaintiffs to rely on FSS's newsletter given that, two months earlier, the 'Stock Detective' website posted an extremely negative article on FSS. . . . This argument is also unpersuasive. FSS fails to allege that a single member of the class was aware of the Stock Detective assessment of FSS." The court rejected defendants' motion to dismiss and, as to The Future Superstock, held that "Plaintiffs have adequately alleged falsity, scienter, reliance, and causation, we conclude that Plaintiffs have adequately alleged securities fraud under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5."

See:
Alan Fellman, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs v. Electro Optical Systems Corp., Charles Weaver, George C. Chachas, U.S. Milestone, Thomas Edward Cavanagh, William Levy, Donald & Co., Cosimo Tacopino, the Future Superstock, and Barrow Street Research, Defendants, No. 98 Civ. 6403 LBS, 2000 WL 489713 (S.D.N.Y., Memorandum and Order filed Apr. 25, 2000); Securities Fraud: S.D.N.Y. Allows Fraud Suit Against Internet Newsletter To Proceed, 1(1) e-Trading Legal Alert 8-9 (Andrews Publications June 9, 2000).

cybersecuritieslaw.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext