SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (82290)7/13/2000 1:05:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (2) of 132070
 
Richard, the problem is, most of the medical devices cos. are fairly large and often diversified. Heck, even with their new aliases, Perkin Elmer (now PE Bio) and Beckman Instruments (now Beckman-coultier) are the class acts, and they are not likely to be fast growers. Another choice is Hewlett Packard, but I hear they do other things, too. <g> I would probably go with BEC if I was forced to, but I'd like to see it a bit cheaper. Another one I've had great luck with over the decades is something of a peripheral play, Bausch and Lomb. But they are at the top of their trading range and I am not likely to buy here.

There are many cos. in this space, but not very many good cos. or very many with superior tech advantages over the competition. The reagents cos. were a great play back during Billary, but they have gotten way past my price range.

So, I agree with you on fundamentals, but I am still leery of the valuations.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext