hb,
Yes, it might be time to replace currently created information
that is onging and changing from present to newly created
past, and forecast the later near future as in days and weeks
with old past information of the type "history repeats itself".
for example,
<<GATA, even if it is 100% right,
it faces almost insurmountable odds -
its opponents are clearly too powerful.>>
leads to a 95% probability that this time next year,
July 2001, GATA's web site of gata.org
will have the contents of an organization to promote
the, as follows, Gaudy And Tasteless Art.
The Le Metropole Cafe was also take a hit,
as readers of the commentaries have already
obtained that any moment the sky will fall,
the dam will bust and house of cards are
quickly loosing their foundations. Aliken
this to one who visits New York City once
every year, but here its every day at the Cafe,
and each day its the same message received
at that N.Y. City streetcorner of "...will end"
and each day/week/month, into years, the same
streetcorner remains the same, no end and same
message of soon aChange.
there is a lemetrocafe.com
might be a lemetropolis.com
could be a lemetropoliscafe.com
wanna be a lemetropole.com
will be a lemetropolecafe.com
url For Sale
<<..lease rates below 1% look rather fishy...>>
But its legal, no?
As for the Bank of England selling the physical gold
of it's country, I remembered many opinions that she
did so from the bullying of the USA, but another reason
was given I could not remember until the following,
and it reminds me that like some who question if the
usa fort knox really has the american citizens gold
still there, the similar place for the nation England
might not of had it anymore physically there but lent
out and knowingly unable to get back the physical.
So what better way to wiggle out of a scam-a-rama
disclosure then to sell for cash the physical so
that everyone expects it to be gone. Could explain
why England wants the lowest possible price per ounce,
as this paper fiat money received is only smoke and
mirrors, the less the better, as for sure if they
were able to sell it for $500/oz, then they would
need to fudge the bookkeeping too much, but at the
lower prices, then England and the other manipulators
that caused the bad situation can wheel and deal
with other stupid=corrupt parties wanting to keep
the price of gold low. doug
To: heinz blasnik
From: Rarebird
Friday, July 14, 2000
I think it's possible that the BOE had leased out
much of its gold reserves at the time and was in
danger of not getting their gold back. That is why
they publicly announced on May 7, 1999, that they
were selling their gold via auctions. I don't think
the BOE was dumb or stupid. I think the BOE had much
more to lose if the POG continued to rally at the time..... |
