SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS)
COMS 0.00130-23.5%Nov 7 11:47 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: miklosh who wrote (43939)7/15/2000 8:28:03 AM
From: kcmike  Read Replies (1) of 45548
 
miklosh,

Regarding your comments to mr. mark:

<<EB said months ago that the ratio would be 1:1.5, so why has the stock suddenly run up 52% in 12 trading days? Could it be that the street was saying, we'll only believe that number when we see it? If the recent acceleration in $/share was due to the finalization of the split ratio, that does not bode well for the resurrection of EB's credibility>>

I understand your frustration with COMS and EB, and have shared those viewpoints at times. However, I am not sure I understand your comments about the run up in COMS being due to sudden realization that the 1/1.484 ratio is now fact.

COMS (sans PALM) has run up very little in that time. To use your time frame, PALM was 31.9 on 7/3, and COMS was 45.4. On 7/14, PALM closed at 55.9375 and COMS closed at 73.65.

If you apply the 1.484 ratio, then COMS sans PALM has only "run up" less that 2 1/2 points. I hardly call that dramatic, do you? In fact, I would suggest that the run up has little or nothing to do with COMS itself, but instead with the runup in PALM from 31.9 to 45.4.

While I agree there is some debate regarding the future of COMS as a separate entity, I do think there is tremendous potential for PALM, and there may even be more runup yet. We can always hope! :>)

Good luck in your exit strategy!

Mike
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext