SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : About that Cuban boy, Elian

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill who wrote (8732)7/18/2000 10:33:13 AM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (2) of 9127
 
The laws are based on an assessment of threat, not an evaluation of the relative values of the lives concerned. It seems legitimate to me to criticize that assessment of threat, though there are doubtless two sides to that story. I could accept an argument that an inaccurate assessment of threat has inadvertently created a situation where laws seem to favor one life over another. But claiming that there is some deliberate attempt to place a premium on the lives of homosexuals seems a bit past the line of pointless rhetoric to me. The territory for argument is the level of threat, not the relative value of gay or straight lives.

It is a situation very similar to those in which attempts to make gay youth feel comfortable with what they are and make straight youth more tolerant of gays are attacked as "recruitment attempts". It is legitimate to criticize such attempts on the grounds that they may not achieve their purpose, or on the grounds that in the pursuit of this goal they cover material which is not appropriate to the venue, or on a number of other grounds. But claiming that they are organized attempts to persuade young people to become gay are ridiculous and counterproductive.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext