2000:The Make-or-Break Election Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : 2000:The Make-or-Break Election

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jlallen who wrote (395)	7/18/2000 11:56:50 AM
From: ztect	Read Replies (2) of 1013

Overwhelming? The ballistics of Graham's gun didn't even match with those of the gun used in the murder. Overwhelming? The white "eye" witness whose testimony largely convicted graham was shown only one mug shot of a person w. short hair and no facial hair who she originally said had a darker complexion and was thinner. Overwhelming? This witness picked the only person who was included in both the mug shots and the line up and still the only one with short hair and no facial hair. Overwhelming? Two other eye witnesses clearly said distinctly that Graham wasn't the man, and didn't identify him in mug shots or line ups. Overwhelming? Graham had four alibi witnesses that passed polygraphs. Overwhelming? There was no physical evidence that placed Graham at the scene The only thing "overwhelming" was the incompetence of the court appointed attorney for Graham who did NOT even admit into evidence any of the above information. The only thing "overwhelming" is that the Appeals Court in Texas failed by not allowing for a new trial. Overworked with case loads, and incompetent due to training, court appointed counsel does not have the means, methods, or abilities to capably put on a defense for any person. We shouldn't have two systems of justice, that is one for those that can afford an adequate defense and another for those that can't. Again the only thing overwhelming is that there was reasonable doubt. One has to be proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt- not proven innocent beyond all doubt.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next