| TP, Well you seemed to want to glorify the animals because you considered their adaptation of the species to be superior to mankind. Clearly, that is not so. We don't need the changes occurring in animals to adapt to the environment, because (as Neocon said) man can adapt the environment to suit him. So, IMO, your reference to the animals was moot, at best, and has no real bearing on the subject. Note, it is adaptation, which mankind, that was created, also did before developing the needed technology, not evolution, as you seem to imply. Even today, humans adapt to the climate they live in but, they have not evolved. If they move back where they came from, the adaptation is reversed to fit the environment. Such is NOT evolution. ~H~ |
