FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL)

FTEL 0.659

+1.4%

Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: vic klimpl who wrote (11220)	5/15/1997 12:19:00 AM
From: Stephen B. Temple	of 41046

"Anybody who really wants to leverage multiple media [over frame relay] has to get rid of the premise of using one PVC," The only way to ensure that voice and video quality will be transmitted at acceptable levels when transversing a frame-relay WAN with SNA and LAN data is to separate the different traffic types onto separate PVCs. I was thinking about the Voice-over-Internet and Frame-Relay. The frame relay technology that was spoken of in the article requires only a single connection point, rather than the nine of earlier networks (X-25). T-1 Frame-relay..that's the future with PVC's (permanent virtual circuits) which connect two sites just as a private line would, but in this case the bandwith is shared amoung multiple users, rather than being dedicated to the one site for access "to a single site". Fewer connections such as CPU ports, router ports means money saved to the customer. Sounds like a long term winner, with great results requiring FTEL products. ggg Anyone for setting up your own LAN? g Better read the story again, you don't want to miss any major points: wcmh.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next