Microvision (MVIS) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Microvision (MVIS)

MVIS 0.803

-0.9%

10:10 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: dwight martin who wrote (4800)	7/21/2000 8:29:02 PM
From: Obewon	Read Replies (1) of 7721

Gotta disagree with you dwight. While I agree that the editors turned decidedly negative towards management (not the Company as a whole nor the tech), I think that each issue that they addressed NEEDED to be addressed. These issues can too often creep along unnoticed by the market until shareholders are screwed. I agree that a regular parking lot report was uncalled for, but an indication of the amount of overtime that employees are putting in is a descent idea (if executed properly and not antagonisticly) especially for a startup company. Their approach was not as "undyingly oppositional" as you seem to think. They appeared more than willing to work with the Company to address several issues which were (and continue to be IMHO) problems with the Company. From my information, it was management that decided it didn't want to listen to anyone (and from what I know of Rick I can certainly believe this). Needless to say, its water under the bridge now. You have your opinion of them and I have a different one. Neither really matters a hill of beans to MVIS's value. I hope that someone can now fill the breach to supply us with decent information on the Company. Valuation Guy/Obewon

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next