victor, I've explained my position. Why don't you explain yours? I know that you want management to reveal more, such as the names the new customers. I also know that you want more "substantial press releases" at the rate of two per week. Why? What makes you think that the company would be better off if the names of all its customers were known? What makes you think there is substantial news that you are entitled to at that rate? What do you think these press releases will accomplish? What harm will they cause? How will they benefit long term shareholders?
I have defended the companies position because it is easy to do so, the amount of their PR is slightly high but not unusual. On the other hand, you sit back and say "we need more PR" and you have yet to establish any reason why, or what type of PR you want or feel you are entitled to. Frankly, I think you get into logical difficulties because you are focused on the balance in your brokerage account and you, like so many others want to justify that your pet investment is "grossly undervalued", but that it wouldn't be if management would just spend more time pumping up the stock. You probably hold the stock at a loss, or at least held it through the rise up and down, and you are trying to justify your investment decisions by transferring the blame to management.
The fact is that the value of the company is what the market says it is, not what you say it is. The fact is that there are thousands of other stocks out there, some of which issue more PR than NETP. You are welcome to invest in them, should you choose to do so. The fact is that we each get to take the credit for good investment decisions and the blame for bad investment decisions, and it isn't management's responsibility unless they actively defraud us.
Good luck with your investments. There doesn't seem to be much to be gained from continuing this line of discussion.
Carl |
