SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : G&K Investing for Curmudgeons

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tekboy who wrote (4093)7/24/2000 11:22:21 AM
From: Pawhuska49  Read Replies (2) of 22706
 
tekboy is right

Waaay too serious a response follows.

OK, I was tired last night, and I only follow one of these two sports. The question wasn't which sport is more athletic or tougher, but which of these two competitors is more impressive.

I only follow one of these sports. The greatest cyclist of all time was Eddy Merckx, and Lance would agree he's not yet equal to Merckx. But from the commentary, Tiger Woods seems to be dominating golf like Eddy Merckx dominated cycling.

Measured this way, Tiger Woods is more impressive. But since I only know cycling, I follow Lance and I'm personally impressed by his accomplishments.

So I feel very strongly both ways, which should entitle me to run for some kind of office or something.

In the end uf is right and this was a great day for American sport.

Mike
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext