SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: kumar who wrote (28688)7/25/2000 8:34:55 AM
From: DownSouth  Read Replies (2) of 54805
 
Being privileged to be a friend of a 30 year pro photog, I have been able to closely examine the difference between digital and film photography as it has progressed over the past few years.

Without going into technical detail, I will boil it down to this. For fine art, film photography is still the preferred standard. For advertising, digital photography is meeting the standards of that industry and giving the advantage of lower labor costs, faster turn around, more productivity, and lower overall cost.

For home photography, digital photography is very acceptable in terms of quality and cost.

A CoolPix 950 or 990 is a great camera for $500 to $900, with features that are much more capable than a point and shoot camera.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News