Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 172.29

-2.2%

Dec 17 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Getch who wrote (1375)	7/25/2000 6:18:33 PM
From: Cooters	Read Replies (1) of 196981

Getch, <<What then, is the reason for W-CDMA to exist?>> Assuming there is a cabal of W-CDMA IPR holders who come to a cross-licensing arrangement similar to GSM, the only remaining difference to this group is non-members would still be required to pay the members for W-CDMA equipment. -Edit: SpinCo is neither of the above- In addition, if a W-CDMA IPR holder does not plan to sell any W-CDMA equipment, SpinCo would need to obtain a license and pay royalties to that company. I care not to take that part any further.... Cooters

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next