SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 459.86+0.7%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John F. Dowd who wrote (48170)7/26/2000 1:31:34 PM
From: The Duke of URL©  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
If memory serves, I believe that Judge Jackson's final order was 427 pages long, but with no references to the evidence in the court record. (It should be line by line) This makes it unacceptably difficult for an Appellate Court to review.

IF this is correct, this reason alone, is sufficient to believe that the Supreme Court will refuse to hear the case.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News