A fashionable garimpero like yourself should wear this averagejoe.com when swilling Tuscany wine.
If you think I am going to visit your web site... forget it ! this is far better.... read on...
Message 14110841
As usual, your lies are made better by your dignified stupidity.
The above post was originated here:
Your post :
To: Solon who wrote (84)
From: average joe Wednesday, July 26, 2000 12:06 AM ET
Reply # of 106
Jewish women have a lower incidence of cervical cancer than other races. Experts in the field have linked this to Jewish male circumcision.
Message 14107442
To which Solon requested some URL references (Oh well, those facts again !!)
And your glorious response to his request:
Message 14109142
Except that... as Solon points out, 2 out of the 3 given references, REFUTE your statement. As shown above.
I guess that is what happens when you horse around with smegma. [in your case you must be smegming around with horses HAHAHAHAHAHA] --more like burros pendejos heeeeeee haaaaaawwwww heeeeeeee haaaaaaaawwww
When you were a child, your parents must have drugged you thinking you were having epilepsy attacks. Except that, you were only masturbating.
See your OWN reference (# 2) given in the post to Solon. For your convenience, I have provided the links and copied below the relevant part:
cirp.org
The hypothesis that human male smegma is carcinogenic was first formulated in 1932 by Abraham L. Wolbarst1. Wolbarst also believed that circumcision prevented epilepsy. (In the early part of the 20th Century, the paroxysm of masturbation in children was often misidentified as an epileptic seizure.) Wolbarst wrote: "[Circumcision] diminishes the tendency to masturbation, convulsions and other reflex phenomena of local irritation." Wolbarst's beliefs about circumcision were shared by other writers, such as Peter Remondino and Abraham Ravich.
No laboratory or clinical research had been done on the subject at the time. Regardless, Wolbarst's hypothesis about smegma and cancer found its way into early medical textbooks. In the 1950s a few experiments were done to test the hypothesis by injecting horse smegma into wounds made in the backs of mice. There were clinical studies that attempted to induce cancer by introducing smegma subcutaneously and intravaginally: No carcinomas could be induced.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....
That is one of many possible explanations to your idiotic posts.
HOHOHOHOHOHO
Keep it up, it is now fun to read your idiocy as I now have an explanation for it, just like watching those rats in a laboratory, getting "smegmaized"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
... but there is more...
The only reference that supports your statement, also indicates that...
What Causes, or Increases the Risk, for Cervical Cancer?
Like any other cancer, the exact reason why one woman gets cervical cancer and another does not is unknown . However, several things are noted to increase the risk:
1) Being Female is obviously the biggest risk factor for cervical cancer.
canceranswers.com
Duh !
I guess that by the same token, females do not suffer of penile cancer !
Another proof of the Internet Quasimodos !
p.s. When you were born, the cervix did not dilate sufficiently so as to allow the normal passing of your head through the vaginal canal, hence your brains where squashed, as if you were in a spaghetti maker, as the doctor finally fished you out with forceps.
Too bad, so sad...!
I'd rather "swillow" Tuscan wine, than horse smegma like you.
You should take Solon's advice and start the "smegma thread" imagine, all your mates would gather in one place discussing the suffering of epilepsy while you were kids. |
