SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Uncle Frank who wrote (28940)7/26/2000 6:38:22 PM
From: Mike Buckley  Read Replies (1) of 54805
 
Frank,

I'm not waiting to see if you've already got 20 responses. Sorry, everyone. :)

If NOK signed up for 3G now, would they avoid having to deal with spinco later on?

Yes and no. Spinco is a fully operational wholly owned subsidiary as we speak with its new CEO at the helm. The only difference between Spinco now and post-IPO Spinco is that 90% of it will be owned by Qualcomm instead of 100% of it. That changes about a year from now when shares get transferred to current Qualcomm shareholders, leaving Qualcomm at most a minority position in Spinco.

My point is that it will be easier to negotiate a 3G deal during the next year or so while Qualcomm owns a controlling interest in Spinco than later. As a similar example in reverse, remember that Qualcomm's licensing agreement is not with Unicom; it's with Unicom's parent company. I think the ability to motivate companies to sign 3G licenses now is part of the reason Qualcomm is waiting a year to distribute the shares not sold to the public. It creates a certain sense of urgency for the companies that have not signed 3G licenses.

--Mike Buckley
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext