??? No one should be upset about anyone posting the letter, or the link, of course it should have been posted, and the link was posted twice, and the complete article once, 20 minutes before you got around to it.
And it was posted first by bigbuk, who I believe has a very sizeable stake in VITC.
Message 14127828
Your post with the link came 20 minutes later.
Message 14127947
If people are upset, I think it could be because you appeared to have been sucked in by the tone of the Davis article and that they could be suspended and delisted anytime.
I say again, that SEC stuff is old news, and has been in filings for about 2 years, and if anyone had bothered to read the VITC/DHMG thread for 1998 you will see it discussed there.
Start about here.
Message 4031730
I also suspect that if you check way back on this thread, when it was DHMG and we all first got into it, that it was discussed here. I just spoke to RG and he remembers me and others here asking him about the SEC thing last January or February. We were satisfied with the answers then, and since the answers have not changed, I am still satisfied.
Point is, it's old news, about someone long since with no involvement with the company, and it has been discussed on SI since April 1998.
I first noticed the SEC bit in the August 14,1998 filing.
freedgar.com
But, if Bob Davis, or you, or anyone else has something new on this, please post it. Good DD and helping each other out, is what this thread is all about.
And that means good news, or bad news.
Best regards,
Jim |
