SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Clappy who wrote (27138)7/30/2000 12:43:14 PM
From: Voltaire  Read Replies (1) of 35685
 
Afternoon Clap,

I know this is not what you are wanting to hear but it is nothing more than a logical deduction and feel after scanning for hours and hours and then drawing the conclusion.

There are however certain dynamics that tend to draw me to all of the stocks you and I have mentioned. At the time of my sudden affinity to the above mentioned stocks they possessed certain qualities.

1. THEY MUST NOT BE IN DISFAVOR WITH THE STREET or HOUSES.

2. THEY MUST BASICALLY BE A QUASI-MONOPOLY

3. OUTSTANDING IF THEY HAVE A RELATIVELY LOW FLOAT

4. GREED OF THE HOUSES MUST BE STIMULATED BY PROJECTION OF UNREAL EARNINGS POTENTIAL

5. THEIR COMPETITION MUST ABSOLUTELY LOATH AND FEAR THEM

6. STUMBLING BLOCKS MUST BE VISIBLE TO ALL - THIS IS WHAT SENT THE Q UP AND WILL DO THE SAME FOR THE R

The NAZ and this downturn is nothing more than a self fulfilling TA move. The Houses will allow it to go down a bit further and then they come out and defend their inventory but remember the Houses make money both ways. They suck the longs in on the up moves and the shorts on the down moves and laugh the whole time as we move eventually this year to 5000.

V
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext