Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 174.01

-0.3%

Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: cfoe who wrote (1639)	7/31/2000 3:24:04 AM
From: lkj	Read Replies (2) of 196649

No, you didn't answer the question. If I were a GSM IP holder, I will swap a single IP for SpinCo's CDMA IP, and I will swap the others with Qualcomm's, regardless to whether Qualcomm makes any ASIC or not. Q still owns 90% of SpinCo, and IJ is still the Chair and Sulpozio is the CEO. GSM guys are not stupid. It makes zero sense to why this spin off is needed to cross-license GSM IPs at a "reasonable" price. Spinning off SpinCo does not change anything materially from an IP swapping side. Khan

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next