Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 48.23

+2.3%

Feb 11 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ira Vine who wrote (22011)	5/15/1997 7:01:00 PM
From: Harry Landsiedel	of 186894

Re: DEC's virulent attack. I agree with you. In all I have read on this thread, no one has come up with a convincing reason for why such an approach could benefit DEC in any way. The best reasoning for the suit seems to be a fear of the Merced and an attempt to squeeze in between INTC and HP. But coming on the way they have and "personalizing" the attack on Grove/Barrett seems to be inmature to say the least. From the DEC comments, your "conspiracy" thought could be closer than the rational person might think. For some, it's tough to accept responsibility for your own failures. It is very appealing to blame it on your competitor taking unfair advantage of you. To me the full page ad is the clincher in this scenario. It reminds me of the Confederacy and the "Lost Cause." It's weird. Fortunately, it has only taken the market two days to see through DEC's case and conclude that it may not be that damaging to Intel. I wonder when they will conclude that Intel's success could spell DEC's doom and bail out entirely. HL

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next