SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zeev Hed who wrote (3884)7/31/2000 8:27:05 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) of 30051
 
Zeev,
Is this how you got your bottom estimate?
Comments?....).

I also realize we must re-trace some of the recent run-up. If based on technical analysis, what is the exact basis? Backing and filling of gaps? Trend lines? Can someone please spell this out in detail for me, as I am not experience in Chart Reading.

On October 9, 1998 the Nasdaq bottomed at 1419.11 (the last big dip). The Nasdaq peaked on March 10, 2000 at 5132.52. A retracement is by taking a percentage drop from 5132 back to 1419.

According to John J. Murphy in "The Visual Investor", the most common retracement figures for a market correction are 33%, 38%, 50%, 62%, and 66%. The Fibonacci ratios are 38% and 62%.

Using those retracements gives the following prices for the Nasdaq:
33% = 3,907 (already broken)
38% = 3,721 (already broken)
50% = 3,275 (already broken)
62% = 2,830
66% = 2,682

Retracements of 66% are considered severe. If it retraces more than that, then a total trend reversal is most likely taking place (i.e. changing from a positive Bull trend to a negative Bear trend). So technically, the Nasdaq could retrace back to 2,682, then reverse itself and begin another climb without ever being in a "bear market" trend. It would just be a severe correction within a bull market trend. Look at the Tokyo Nikkei Index for a bear market trend since 1990 - ouch!

-surfcr8z
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext