Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: gdichaz who wrote (29223)	8/1/2000 9:28:51 PM
From: Mike Buckley	Read Replies (2) of 54805

Cha2, Geof Moore called Intel a gorilla, but what he never did was to make the case for why. He devoted three pages to making that case, beginning on page 81 in TRFM. The section is titled, "Gorilla Power at Work: The Example of Intel." Based on the standards which seem to be used on this, your thread, the proof of Intel's gorilla status is what? The "proof" is so much better stated in pages 81-83 that I won't bore you with a paraphrase. What is Intel's IPR or what is it that Intel has to make it more than a King? Your premis is wrong. IPR per se isn't needed. Siebel, Oracle, and Microsoft don't have any IPR that prevent other companies from developing competing products. The key isn't that the IPR ties competitors' hands. Instead, the key is that a company's product is accepted as the de facto standard. Read pages 81 - 83 and tell me where Moore and Gang are wrong. --Mike Buckley

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next