Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 43.47

+8.6%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: SisterMaryElephant who wrote (106665)	8/2/2000 12:56:13 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Steve - Re: "Point me to an article written by Reuters, or EBN or other professional trade publications were the journalist refers to Intel's headquarters (i.e. Intel) as "satan". I can see how we here on this thread take certain liberties with names, but this is ridiculous, IMHO." Excellent, EXCELLENT POINT !!! Tom PabstSmear has shown himself AGAIN to be a raving lunatic. First, if he had a problem with the 1.13 GHz P3, he should have resolved it with Intel in a professional manner - and then related that issue during a proper review once his problems were resolved. Did he? No. He immediately hopped on the Internet and issued a SMEAR and BLAST campaign at Intel. And then he expected Intel to politely CALL HIM !! In his second article, he admits he was completley wrong about the Microcode issue he raised in the first article - again, showing himself to be a cheap opportunist looking to promote himself at Intel's expense. Tom Pabst is as phoney as they come. We've seen his type before - and what they try to get away with. Paul

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next