SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 35.87+0.3%2:11 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pgerassi who wrote (106783)8/2/2000 6:16:38 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
Re: "This is the basic curve to look for an explanation. Evidently, Intel did not cover in testing of this part over a sufficient time to allow for all the failures the occur in the first part of the curve"

That's not the purpose of production test. That's what burnin is for. I don't know if Intel burns in their engineering samples nor do I know if Tom got an Engineering sample. If he got a production part, the chance of an early life failure is very very low. Well below 0.1%. Probably below 0.05%. A non burnedin part would have a slightly higher failure rate but still very low.

EP
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext