SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (546)8/3/2000 3:31:56 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) of 12465
 
Re: 7/6/00 - [RENT] Notice of Subpoena

To my surprise...
by: recurve333 7/6/00 10:00 pm
Msg: 2929 of 3018
The following was in my inbox after I arrived back from the ball game last night:

"NOTICE OF SUBPOENA (from Yahoo! legal dept.)

We are writing to inform you that Yahoo! has been served with a
subpoena requiring disclosure of information related to your
user account at Yahoo!

The subpoena was issued in an action entitled:
Rentrak Corporation v. Kundinger, et. al., CV00-820-HA
pending in:
United States District Court, Northern District of California

The subpoena, dated 06/21/2000, requires that Yahoo!
produce documents related to your Yahoo! account.

The attorney for the subpoenaing party, Latham & Watkins, is
Peter H. Benzian
701 "B" Street
Suite 2100
San Diego, CA 92101
619-236-1234 (phone)
619-696-7419 (fax)

Please be advised that Yahoo! will respond to the subpoena five days
from the date of this notice, unless we have notice that a motion
to quash the subpoena has been filed, or the matter has been
otherwise resolved.

You may wish to consult an attorney to advise you about the
foregoing. Please contact the subpoenaing party to obtain a copy
of the subpoena. If you wish to contact Yahoo! regarding this
matter, please direct your correspondence to
notice-user@yahoo-inc.com."
.....

This is not an attempt at humor on my part.

What an act of desperation. I have nothing to do with Rentrak vs. Kundinger et.al. I don't even know Kundinger.

Just another waste of Rentrak shareholder money. Perhaps an act of intimidation on Ron's part.

Last time I checked, we have a right in this country to free speech. Yes, I have offered some strong opinions here, but I believe that the facts are on my side. I suspect that all or many posters here have been effected in the same way. Anyone else care to share?

If anyone can, would you care to explain any of the details of Rentrak vs. Kundinger? Any ideas why I/we have now become involved in this?

As I have stated, actions of RENT management have provided significant weight to my opinions: REPLACE CURRENT MANAGEMENT. I have been a long-term shareholder and only want my investment to flourish. I want management to consider shareholders before themselves.

10Ks and 10Qs don't lie. Now I can't wait for the annual proxy notice and information regarding Ron's compensation.

Ron: I have been one of RENT's ambassadors for years, to the detriment of my pocketbook. Our company has not been successful with you and your team at the helm.

messages.yahoo.com

=====

Notice of Subpoena
by: wapuff 7/6/00 10:13 pm
Msg: 2930 of 3018
I received the same notice. What a waste of shareholder money!

messages.yahoo.com

=====

me too
by: kdw_97203 7/7/00 12:00 am
Msg: 2931 of 3018
I have not been around this company for 5 yrs and still own shares from my options. KFC I will call you tomorrow

messages.yahoo.com

=====

It's Quashing Time Ronnie!!
by: blabbotheklown (M/canada) 7/7/00 1:44 am
Msg: 2932 of 3018
The major stockholders are in motion.
That little subpoena trick doesn't scare anyone. How about a visit from the S.E.C. to Airport Way to investigate the little stock manuevers on your part.....cuz I don't think the major stockholders are happy. Your'e lucky I'm not a stockholder..

messages.yahoo.com

=====

me too
by: strap68 7/7/00 2:16 am
Msg: 2933 of 3018
I recieved the same message. I am the
husband of an X employee (lay off may 23rd). I am also a shareholder only because my wife incisted this company was well worth the investment. I have watched her give it all for 81/2 years and when she got layed off she even still said nothing against the company. She needed a resume from Chris Roberts for a job she applied for and he refused because she was posting on yahoo. This is after she put up with all kinds of crap from this punk.

messages.yahoo.com

=====

Subpoena
by: Cowboy9983 7/7/00 10:33 am
Msg: 2935 of 3018
I got a notice of Supoena also.
Ron must have a lot of money to burn. An attorney has to cost over $150 per hour. All the time getting supoenas to Yahoo and later follow up must cost a lot of bucks.
The shareholders want Ron out because of poor performance. Instead of wasting more money in the legal system why isn't he trying to raise the stock price. We would vote to keep him in if he could get this price up to $8 or $9.

messages.yahoo.com

=====

case
by: movie_trailer_trash (25/F/Deep South in the Paw Paw) 7/7/00 2:54 pm
Msg: 2940 of 3018
The case is:
Rentrak Corporation v. Donald J. Kundinger, et al.
Oregon District Court Case #00CV820HA

Plaintiff is Donald J. Kundinger;
Paul Bogdanich; Jackson Hole Advisors, a Wyoming sole propietorship;
Paul Rosenbaum;
Cecil D. Andrus;
Michael J. Annechino;
Mark A. Brown;
George H. Kuper;
Joon S. Moon;
James G. Petcoff;
Gordon A. Reck;
Donald W. Remlinger;
Guy R. Wolcott;
David Rosencrantz;
Gene Tinker;
Thomas S. Cousins;
and Bruce Ament.

Latham & Watkins is one of Rent law firms, Stoel Rives is where depos are being done.

messages.yahoo.com

Correction
by: movie_trailer_trash (25/F/Deep South in the Paw Paw) 7/7/00 10:09 pm
Msg: 2943 of 3018
The list of Jackson Hole Advisors are defendants.

My Apologies.

messages.yahoo.com

=====

Subpoena list:

list
by: movie_trailer_trash (25/F/Deep South in the Paw Paw) 7/7/00 2:47 pm
Msg: 2937 of 3018

mbaandmore, callforsanity, xmaspartycommittee, dudeily, chmiss2000, mrlucky200, mild78, msbrgr, readread4, killshot1999, ipo3pfasap, recurve333, Rentmeister, bob2539, albert_meat, ads1597132, JHR0001, Pettrova, wapuff, Cowboy9983, seattleslew2u, strap68, kickhisbaldassout, iamronsbaby, kickhisbuttout, kingorpoe, watrncollet, myteemite2, muckingfess, worriedaboutrent, theyhavetogo, thirty2sixtydays, secondthemotion, clearspeak111,

messages.yahoo.com
messages.yahoo.com
messages.yahoo.com

=====

I am really UPSET!!!
by: recurve333 7/7/00 4:28 pm
Msg: 2942 of 3018
... that I was not first on the subpoena list!!

No respect as a poster (just kidding).
No respect as a shareholder (not kidding).

(what a waste of shareholder's money!)

messages.yahoo.com

=====

suit
by: sturgeonmark (44/M/Warrenton, OR) 7/9/00 11:40 am
Msg: 2945 of 3018
It would seem to me the only good thing about all this legal positioning is that rent will probably have to keep the stock around these current levels or better in order to help survive this suit.

messages.yahoo.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext