Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 35.81

+0.2%

Nov 25 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Engel who wrote (106818)	8/3/2000 9:50:48 AM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (2) of 186894

Paul, What proof do you have that the part sent to Tom PabstSmear wasn't working properly when he received it? The part works at <850MHz, but not at any higher speeds. This is an indication of a speed problem, rather than a defect. Had the part been mishandled, the symptoms would be non-functional, rather than slow. To suggest that Tom damaged the part is absurd. The bozo spent one day ranting and raving about a BIOS MICROCODE Issue - then the next day retracted that accusation - saying that a BIOS/Microcode issues wasn't the problem. He made the mistake of giving Intel the benefit of the doubt. That will teach him. You are grasping at straws. Scumbria

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next