Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Scumbria who wrote (121700)	8/3/2000 5:14:30 PM
From: Gopher Broke	Read Replies (1) of 1575453

On balance, Paul, Elmer, Yousef, and other Intellabees have been correct about AMD stock performance far more often than most of the longs on the thread. I disagree. By their actions they have called AMD's meteoric rise correctly and profited from it, but their posts have been very misleading. Paul is stocking up on AMD and at the same time posting that they are going down the tubes. Elmer is knocking AMD and at the same time writing naked puts (which I think he may be regretting a little at present). Both of them want and expect AMD to do well. They just get a kick out of stirring things up. I think the "correctness" of their predictions has to be judged by the nature of their posts and, in that regard, I would say that Elmer generally implies AMD should continue flat (to allow him to milk his puts and covered calls) and Paul implies AMD should dive to zero (beats me why - so he can lose out on his substantial AMD investment?). Both have proven to be very incorrect predictions over the last year. And the most incorrect of all is that they are both still bullish on Intel. IMO Intel have seen their final all-time high.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next