<<I find your dogged pursuit insulting>>
What dogged pursuit are you referring to? I asked a simple question, for which I was harshly and IMO inappropriately accused.
<<If you were to post the fruit of you labor for others to consider, engage others in discussion about this investment on a public forum, or write a formal investment thesis for all interested to review only to be accused of being spoon-fed that same information and regurgitating it under some clandestine arrangement with a corporation I think you would be insulted as well.>>
Aus, I totally agree that if indeed you are nothing more than just one of us 'average joe' investors, to be repeatedly accused of being something more would get tiresome, particularly in light of all the hard work you put in.
Now on the other hand, I contend that it would be a shocking thing to be passing yourself off as just another one of us zealot, hardworking 'average joe' investors while in actuality, receiving privileged information while concurrently and categorically denying it.
Someone is private emailing me in unsolicited fashion, accusing you of misrepresenting yourself! They further say you have admitted to signing a confidentiality agreement with SanDisk. They have even sent me an 'apparent' copy of an email from you in which you admit it. What in the blazes does that mean?
On the other hand, if their repeated accusations of such are a fabrication, then I think such a think is beyond reprehensible. |
