WDC/Sandisk Corporation Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation

WDC 171.98

-1.3%

1:44 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jason W who wrote (13622)	8/6/2000 6:41:27 AM
From: Allegoria	Read Replies (7) of 60323

Ausdauer IS a SanDisk employee. His own words. He IS under contractual agreement with SanDisk. Message 14168597 Message 14169527 Any other post claiming otherwise is only meant to mislead. Message 14169540 I don't have a problem with that fact that Ausdauer is a SanDisk employee. Quite the contrary - this fact may allow him to provide useful information missed by the rest of us. Because I have held long positions in both SNDK & SSTI - I AM interested in the truthfulness of the claims made on both threads. I will continue to challenge unsupported, false claims made by anyone and hope the thread is supportive of anyone doing so. It is this quality that distinguishes SI from the RB and Yahoo boards. If some to not care that an EMPLOYEE OF SanDisk is lying on this thread - that is fine. But I do. I sure as heck want anyone in his position to be HONEST and STRAIGHFORWARD about his relationship with the company. The very fact that he has posted in every way possible to conceal this fact is cause for concern. Just look at his continued attempts to hide / cloud the fact that HE IS an employee: Message 14169540 I have repeatedly pointed out specific lies Ausdauer has made. Review the posts. I do not feel that my posts are frequent enough to cause annoyance. I do not feel that my post are OT or irrelevant to the subject at hand. I read plenty of posts on this thread which I do find irrelevant - just review all the posts concerning which camera to buy…but I'm not complaining. It IS important that clear objectivity is established and maintained when making an argument. No doubt that I am in no way better informed than the rest of you, but as part of my DD I engage in discussions and challenge the strengths and weaknesses of the competing companies. But Jason (and the rest of the Thread), I hope you understand that I do object when the subject of truthfulness and objectivity are swept under the rug. "Ausdauer" and I have discussed at length various aspects of the market in which SSTI & SanDisk participate. As a SanDisk employee I expect AUDAUER to reveal this relationship in the FIRST instance. HE LIED TO ME BY NOT REVEALING HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH SANDISK. That is the thrust of my argument. The fact that he is an employee is not a problem - and can be a benefit to the entire thread. In Ausdauer's case it has not. It has been nothing but one big lie. As such it is fair to point out. AUSDAUER IS AN EMPLOYEE OF SANDISK - he should have been honest enough to make this disclaimer up front. He should be honest enough not to post straight out lies about SSTI or any other company. Btw, I am in no way affiliated or associated with SSTI or SanDisk in any way. "Ausdauer's" name is Tom. Would anyone on the thread know if Tom has broken the law as a result of his concealment of fact? To let everyone know, I am in discussions with SI about this. Good luck, Eric

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next