SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tom Clarke who wrote (84952)8/7/2000 3:09:32 AM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) of 108807
 
I don't see anything there that suggests the intervention of Clinton or any other elected executives. The person quoted is "associate director at the U.S. Department of the Interior's National Park Service". That's a career bureaucracy position: a "member of the administration" to the extent that the Park Service is a part of the executive branch, but the working bureaucracy of the Park Service doesn't change with administrations, and I doubt that a change of administration would change that opinion. If the bill was vetoed, I would call that interference by the administration, but the opinion of a mid-level administrator in the Park Service hardly qualifies.

What I see is a quarrel between Native American groups and scientists, which is gradually being thrashed out through judicial and legislative processes. I don't see anything sinister about that.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News