SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Berkeley Technology Limited (BLKYY)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: J. Conley who wrote (467)8/7/2000 11:15:39 AM
From: J. Conley  Read Replies (2) of 955
 
PORTFOLIO UPDATE:

Three changes: 1) changed DCLK cost basis, 2) added VINA number of shares, 3) added BRCM w/out number of shares.

The portfolio is an estimate of the public holdings.
Relevant notes concerning the SI portfolio are below for those of you who have not seen them or read previous posts in which these holdings were discussed.

BRCM

Added to track stock price. Will add number of shares based on LDP's ownership interest in Silicon Spice when I have the complete numbers and some time.

CNSW

This is a link to the 13G that shows the number of shares, the conversion price is calculated at .79 a share:

freeedgar.com

DCLK

Originally, the numbers were from FBR's latest (June 5 at the time) update which showed 1,377,700 at an actual cost basis of $16.00 per share. Since FBR itself has reported a couple different numbers on this, I am keeping the number of shares the same and adjusting the cost basis to the original investment in NETG, i.e., which I believe was $6.6 million. However, I am fairly certain LDP sold some or all of DCLK last quarter.

GSPN

These links show the press release and the assumptions of the portfolio as originally calculated:

biz.yahoo.com

Message 13865055

HYBR

Here is my post on this calculation in which there is a link to the SEC filings:

Message 14030190

NUFO

Divided into a taxable and non-taxable portion, since the amounts are rather significant. Here is the link to the SEC filing that shows in which LDP division the asset is held and the basis for the division into taxable and non-taxable portions in the SI portfolio.

freeedgar.com

RAMP

FBR's number, which is 2,528,368, does not correspond with RAMP's most recent filing with the SEC. Here is the link and the basis for the SI portfolio number.

freeedgar.com

VINA

Adding the number of shares owned 2,944,402.

VTSS

Here is the press release on VTSS acquisition of SiTera:

biz.yahoo.com

***

I do not believe the others need further comment as the numbers are readily available in their respective SEC filings and they are the same as reported by FBR.

One other note: CNSW and HYBR are both (interest earning) convertible debentures that can be converted at any time by LDP. They are in the SI portfolio for tracking purposes as they currently trade higher than their conversion price (portfolio cost basis). The additional shares of VTSS are also in for tracking purposes.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext