SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 230.23-4.3%Nov 18 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan3 who wrote (3955)8/8/2000 2:54:10 PM
From: mapoloRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Hello, Dan !

You may be right with your assumption, 266MHz FSB will boost overall performance by 10%. Within the hierarchy of memories, the HDD is the "caboose" of the system.

If the operating system does does not access the HDD while performing a calculation, then the access to the DRam is the main impact on the performance (Linux OS f.e. accesses the HDD very rarely). From an Excel-sheet, which I put up
last year, the rough "calculation by thumb" shows an increase of about 90% in performance (FSB 100MHz compared to 266MHz), when only cpu-registers, L2-cache and FSB are invoked.
But nevertheless the FSB stays the bottleneck of the system, therefore new architectures like "Infiniband" are under investigation.

If I should have overseen something, please feel free to discuss it!

CU

Mapolo
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext