SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 218.79-0.7%10:23 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ian@SI who wrote (36611)8/11/2000 9:21:50 PM
From: Demosthenes  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
Ian,

hheislmier posted the following post explaining his opinion as to why semi equip cycles would become less violent.
(I printed it and have read it everyday since it was posted).

Message 14129265

Katherine chimed in lately and took that post apart piece by piece. She seems to think the cycles will continue to be dramatic because of greed and the quest for market share haven't changed. She pointed out some serious flaws in the "300mm-automation-fab-flexibility-argument."

Captain Morgan sees "a decade of opportunity ahead," whatever that means.

I seem to recall you saying some time ago that you intend to be get out of your equip positions while they are making new highs during this extended up cycle, i.e., that you have no intention to hold through the next down cycle if it can be avoided.

1)Do you still intend to do so?

2)Do you think the cycle will moderate? (I think you have said so recently.) And if so, can you balance your argument effectively against the historical precedent of greed/mkt/share over-spending that usually takes us over the cliff.

I always appreciate your thoughts.

D
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext