SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: average joe who wrote (85320)8/12/2000 2:17:10 PM
From: cosmicforce  Read Replies (1) of 108807
 
My field work used seismic refraction in Pleistocene sedimentary and recent volcanic deposits. Groundwater surveys.

So I asked three leading geophysical experts the following question. If the target is in the basement would it be bigger or smaller on a high resolution survey of 100 metres altitude. i.e. would it be bigger, smaller or not there at all.

Is your point that "experts" disagreed, or that different models produce different expectations? From a single, coarse resolution measurement. I'd be reluctant to make a big $ investment based upon a single high altitude survey of a magnetic anomaly. Unless you see the same kind of data near the surface, it could be in the basement, bedrock or in the alluvium. I'd also want some gravimetric surveys.

What are these people looking for? Gold? Other platinum group minerals?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News