SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 35.10+2.3%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Engel who wrote (107449)8/13/2000 9:42:51 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (3) of 186894
 
Paul,

These added costs - which will require significant time and engineering resources - will have to be weighed against any advantages that an AMD CPU will have over an Intel XEON - which will most likely be limited to the silicon cost.

Ergo, spending $50,000 of engineering time to save $200-$300 on an AMD CPU may not be a top priority on most busy IT managers agendas.


In this scenario, the crossover point would be 250 CPUs before AMD has the advantage. Perhaps large corporations will go first? "No one ever got fired for buying a Col. Sanders Hamster."

BTW: When 1GHz PIII was announced last spring, the official price was about $900. Now that they are actually "available", the price has gone up to $1150. During the same period of time, 1GHz Athlons have gone from $1200 to as low as $495. pricewatch.com

Interesting, isn't it? ;^)

Scumbria
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext