Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 33.62

-4.2%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elmer who wrote (107453)	8/13/2000 11:32:31 AM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Elmer, >The Xeon's added silicon cost is in the additional cache. If FudgeDumper is to be effective in an SMP environment it will need a big cache too. Assuming AMD can ever get SMP working that is..... Why are we comparing Xeon with FudgeDumper? Xeon is current. Isn't the latter a year or so away? Isn't Foster still on the roadmap for next Q1 or Q2? So, why not FudgeDumper vs. Foster (or Itanium)? Tony

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next