SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT
GSAT 63.18-1.8%Nov 13 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maurice Winn who wrote (15610)8/13/2000 12:02:31 PM
From: Rocket Scientist  Read Replies (3) of 29987
 
Maurice, you've recently referenced comments by Q's Dr. Viterbi to support the argument that G* won't be a good carrier of data in addition to voice.

I recall a post of some such comments to the effect that data signals and voice signals should be processed separately, for the obvious reasons that users don't care if data packets arrive several hundred milliseconds late, and that data can be sent at arbitrary and highly variable rates....whereas voice signals, even if processed as packets, have to arrive at the user precisely on time, and with a narrowly set data rate (too slow and voice quality is bad, too fast and bandwidth is wasted.) It doesn't follow from that that the user and network equipment have to be segregated...on the contrary, it's much more efficient if the same equipment can do both services.

As to G* data capacity and pricing...G* has said that it's estimated voice capacity is on the order of 10B minutes per year, but has never really provided the detailed basis of estimate for this figure. A voice equivalent minute of data, assuming a vocoder rate of 9.6 kbs, equals 72 kilo BYTES per minute (so, let's see, that's 720 thousand Giga bytes of data per year!). My understanding of G*'s intent w.r.t. data pricing, is they plan to get the same average price for data as for voice. Then, they should charge wholesale rates of about $0.50 for a 72K file download, (and the retail customer could expect to be soaked for $1.50). 72K is several pages of text in memory hog MSWord; it's about one page of fax'd information, and probably scores of short e-mails. So, I'd judge, it's rather affordable for those types of uses...and the G* handset s/b capable of these rates without any extra equipment

Now, when one is on an airplane or ship, where access to a GEO antenna/reciever is possible, much faster and cheaper data rates are possible, especially for data which can be "broadcast" like movies, news, sports events, popular web site content, etc, and I think that is what IFN and Connexion by Boeing have in mind doing for broadband services.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext