Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LPS5 who wrote (58538)	8/14/2000 8:20:48 AM
From: eims2000	Read Replies (1) of 122087

Though I know about as little of factual cases of insider info as you, I did see a couple examples somewhere. One was if you overheard a conversation in a bar (which any one sitting where you were could) and that was legal. I dont think insider info is the same as secret info as you portray. Also, infomation does not have to be posted publicly it just has to be available to a public person. Certainly, anyone could have hired an engineer to check the BRX area and determined for themselves that there was no gold. They would not have to even make that information public (though if they were short then i suspect they would)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next