Formerly About Applied Materials Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials

AMAT 322.32

-5.6%

Jan 30 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Joseph Beltran who wrote (36744)	8/14/2000 1:31:19 PM
From: michael97123	of 70976

OT-Prohibition "It is high time IMHO that we started looking to our individual states to address most of our grievances..." Wouldn't it be chaotic if each state determined the legality of a product such as cigarettes? I dont think that would work in this case if prohibition was the course chosen. Again, I am not recommending that course just brainstorming. I do agree about the danger of Fed intrusion in our lives but there are some areas where they currently intrude upon freedoms that most folks are in favor of such as the military. So prohibition of cigarettes if viewed as the preventing the sale of a poisonous substance if used as directed, might not really be an intrusion of freedom if one buys into the above premise. Then it would be similar to the ban on sale of ddt or nukes, not a Fed in the bedroom.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next