SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 35.53-1.1%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe NYC who wrote (107560)8/14/2000 10:56:10 PM
From: semiconeng  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
At half of your Fab25 estimate (or 1500 wpw) + 1000 wpw Fab, the 3.6 M would be acceptable (but not outstanding) yield.

Joe


Sorry Joe, the numbers don't add up. At current die size, each 8 inch wafer can contain greater than 250 die, so:

T-Bird Die Size (Largest Size Athlon Die) = 117 mm2
tomshardware.de

Area of circle (Wafer Surface Area) = pi * Radius squared
3.14 * (100mm) squared
3.14 * 10,000 = 31,400mm

Wafer Area / Die Area = Total Die Per Wafer
31,400 / 117 = 268.37 Die Per Wafer

But let's be fair, and count for partial die, and say 250 Die Per wafer.

Total wafers per quarter:
1500 * 12 = 18,000 Wafers/Quarter F25
1000 * 12 = 12,000 Wafers/Quarter F30
-------------------------------------
30,000 Wafers/Quarter 2 Fabs

30,000 * 250 Die Per Wafer = 7.5 Million Die/Quarter

Assuming 100% Yield of course. So if AMD is claiming 3.6 Million, that would mean a yield of less than 50%.

A yield of 48%, doesn't sound too good to me.

SemiconEng
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext