SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : General Magic

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dgurgel who wrote (8929)8/15/2000 6:56:05 AM
From: dgurgel  Read Replies (3) of 10081
 
The Bad Things In The 10-Q

I have traded GMGC for the past thirteen months, almost without exception long. During that time I found three major short-term opportunities based on momentum and promised-news to profit from my investment. I increased my investment yesterday before reading the 10-Q with the expectation of a short-term gain based on price and volume momentum, institutional investment, and a belief that some results from IBM will be announced soon.

I posted portions of the 10-Q last night that I thought had significant new information. I don't want to appear to be hyping the stock (after adding shares), so I am also posting here all of the bad things I found in the 10-Q. (I found little new good news other than the success of the expense reduction program, a mixed blessing for a firm that should be growing, and the expansion of the NOC.)

IBM - The June 22 "memorandum of understanding" has now been replaced by an "agreement" that was signed in July. I would expect that the 10-Q would have to include mention of equity or license fees. Since there was no mention, I conclude that no significant money is being paid by IBM to GMGC now or during the balance of 2000. Near the end of the 10-Q is a list of customers from whom GMGC expects near-term revenue. IBM is not in the list. This agreement seems to provide space-on-the-shelf at the IBM store but little more. Investors should look for near-term results and further specific mention by IBM to determine the potential for the deal.

Qwest - $8.2 million is still owed to Qwest by April 2001 under a take-or-pay contract for NOC communications needs. GMGC is trying to break the contract but may not be successful.

Master Licensees - $2.8 million is owed to two master licensees as refunds (or other) as a result of the demise of the myTalk type services.

Qwest & Master Licensees - The obligations to these parties is not recognized in the most conservative manner on the financial statements. Restatement of these obligations would cause an unfavorable one-time adjustment.

Research - Research expenditures were cut by 2/3 from Q1 1999 ($3.1 million) to Q1 2000 ($1.0 million). I conclude that GMGC has nearly abandoned development of proprietary, patentable technology and that many of the senior engineers and scientists are gone.

Competitors - In eighteen months we have come from a time when there was almost no market for voice application services to a time when the market "intensively competitive." The list of potential competitors is a rapidly growing one.

Now, hcirteg and Seconds, you can reinforce my opinions by posting ad hominem attacks (parodies, misspellings of my name, etc.) or your own analysis of the 10-Q. Your conduct is impolite and makes this forum uncomfortable not only for me but the other readers as well. Perhaps you should post your identities if you feel so strongly.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext