SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (82967)8/15/2000 9:10:57 AM
From: Don Lloyd  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
Wayne -

[I think you know my view on this subject.

The whole issue of accounting for stock options leads you to an endless number of complications ranging from stock price movements, tax benefits, theoretical values and assumptions, fair value of the stock at the time, etc...

There are a variety of ways of looking it. All have advantages and disadvantages. The key point is that if you ignore options you are missing much of the story.]

In my view, virtually all of the complications are the result of severe misconceptions. There is absolutely no reason to be concerned with option valuation methods if, in fact, there is no option expense to the company as a whole, as I claim. Options are granted with the intent of being exercised. To the extent that this true, there is little reason to assume that every outstanding option shouldn't be counted as future stock. If options fall out of the money, they will almost universally be repriced. The main consideration is that a running count be maintained to monitor the options lost as the employee leaves the company, as well as the new ones granted.

I have to take the view that if you don't attack my proof, you haven't yet found a chink in it. -g-

Regards, Don
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext