SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ItsAllCyclical who wrote (70954)8/15/2000 5:30:33 PM
From: upanddown  Read Replies (2) of 95453
 
Jim

API's really not that bad when considering a huge downward revision last week. Not reporting a big prior revision is very misleading.

John

Crude excluding PADD 5 up 5.2 milln
PADD 1 heat stocks +1.7mil
PADD 1 gas stocks - .377
Implied gas demand 9.15 vs 8.75
Implied Heat demand 3.73 vs 3.82
*Crude stocks 286.401 vs 319.163 LY
Gas stocks 202.508 vs 207.013 LY
Heat stocks 113.229 vs 138.738 LY
Crdue imports 9.204 vs 9.357 LW
Product imports 2.126 vs 2.336
AGA guess from Brige for WED
a draw of 50 to 65 BCF

*Revision to Crude stockpile:

Last Week Crude stocks were at 282.602, however this number was revised down to 278.997.

Thus 282.602mil bbls - 278.997mil bbls = -3.605 downward revision.

Hence: 286.401(new) - 278.997(old)=
Build of 7.4 mil bbls

In reality the build should be interpreted as:

286.401(new) - 282.602(old) = +3.79, which is close to guesses, but nonetheless a build

Checking the math:
7.4mil bbl build - 3.605 = +3.79 build for the week ending Aug. 11.

I will analyze more in a second. For example, there was a heat build, but it did little to shrink the year over year deficit.

Supplyside
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext