SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 215.39-0.1%10:53 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pgerassi who wrote (5168)8/15/2000 6:56:03 PM
From: Saturn VRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Dear Pete,
Ref<The 286 is not pipelined. There is no branch misprediction penalty..... .>



We may be arguing about semantics. To me 80286/386 were pipelined, because before the execution of one instruction was complete, the following instruction was loaded and decoded. This means pipelining to me, ie, several instructions are being processed simultaneously, each one slightly ahead of the other. I know that prior to the Pentium, the term branch prediction penalty was irrelevant. So I was using the term branching penalty, "the extra cycles taken when a branch is taken" vs " branch not taken".

Since we are having semantic problems by comparing Pentium 4 with 80286, 8088, I suggest we drop that comparison. Let us stick to the "Pentium" vs "Pentium II(III)" comparison only.

I will reiterate my position that the Pentium II had a higher IPC ( Instructions per Clock) despite a much longer pipeline, than the Pentium.

I expect the same from the Pentium 4.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext