NO vs. GO....
>>>>NO lowers us.
GO uplifts us.>>>>
>>Mommy, Mary said I'm ugly. NO, Dear, Mary is obviously needing to make you feel bad to make herself feel better. This is her problem.
Dad, can I spend some time with you to talk about my science project. I'm busy, GO do it yourself.
Sorry, but I proved the principle wrong. The roles of NO vs. GO were reversed. One example in each case is enough. Logically speaking. NO, can be uplifting. GO, can be debasing.
Therefore, since the words don't make the point and in fact, can be used to demonstrate the exact opposite of what is claimed, perhaps one should find another banner word. Or, better yet, avoid banner words.>>
How we use any word is a function of the framework or perception we define the world from.
Your use of the word "GO" as a personal directive which negates help/service was framed by your perception.
GO is the antithesis if any definitions, directives, commands, etc.
It's simply pure risk, pure action.
NO is the embodiment of definition with an implied directive/command.
The enemy of NO is RISK or GO.
NO is ego - the inversion of risk/GO.
RISK/GO is Love.
NO is a pyramid - limits, boundaries.
GO is an inverted pyramid - no limits, boundaries.
I just believe that through the expression and sharing of love through risk we learn all that's necessary from GO without having to Pass Through NO.
NO breeds fear and separates us from things/each other.
GO creates trust and energy which transcends fear the effect of which brings us together.
Peace.
. |
