SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Who Really Pays Taxes?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Michelino who wrote (412)8/17/2000 7:00:40 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) of 666
 
You obviously don't know presidential greatness when it is apparent to every thinking person. But enough about Reagan.

Clinton lost his impeachment fight in the House and was found in contempt of court for his perjury and obstruction of justice. He has been fined and will be disbarred before he leaves office. After he leaves office, perhaps criminal justice will catch up to him. We can only hope.

As for taxpayer funds expended, $50 million over four years is a small price to pay to assure an honest president in this republic. Compare that total to the bombs Clinton dropped on the pill factory to divert attention from the semen stained dress. If you are so concerned with public monies, perhaps you might want Clinton to repay the taxpayers the $8 million he wasted by denying the Monica charges under oath and to the American people for eight months.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News